SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 15

U.L.BHAT
PAPPOO – Appellant
Versus
KURUVILLA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is a petition under S.276 of the Indian Succession Act for the issuance of a Probate in regard to the estate of late Sri Mathew J. Kollam-parambil on the strength of a registered Will said to have been executed by him. Some of the persons interested in the matter have entered caveat and the petition has been directed to be numbered and treated as suit. A question has now arisen regarding the court-fee payable on the petition. It is pointed out by one of the parties that under the proviso appearing under Art.11 (k) of Schedule II of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act. 1959 (for short the 'Act') court fee has to be paid on the basis of one half of he scale of fee prescribed under Art.1 of Schedule I on the market value of the estate less the fee already paid on the application in a case where it is registered as a suit on the basis of a caveat. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the proviso will not govern the present case and therefore the fee prescribed by the proviso need not be paid in the instant case. This case arises under clause (i) of Art.11 (k).

2. We are considering the question of court fee not on the probate as such, but on






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top