SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 173

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, GEORGE VADAKKEL
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MAUY IGNATIUS – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench is "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Rs. 42,632 being the assessee's share of loss from M/s. Tyre A Rubber Industries, is to be set off against Rs. 50,284 being the share income of the minor children of the assessee from the firm, M/s. Ignatius Mill Stores for the assessment year 1976-77?"

2. That arises on the following facts. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1976-77 the assessee, an individual, was a partner in M/s. Tyre & Rubber Industries and also M/s. Natius Latex Industries. Her two minor children were admitted to the benefits of a partnership, M/s. Ignatius Mill Stores. During the relevant accounting year the assessee's share of loss from M/s. Tyre & Rubber Industries was Rs. 42,636/- and her share of income from M/s. Natius Latex Industries was Rs. 3,764/-. The share income of each of the minor children of the assessee from the firm M/s. Ignatius Mills was Rs. 25,142/-. The assessee filed a return disclosing an income of Rs. 4,200/-. The loss incurred by her in the firm of M/s Tyre & Rubber Industries was set off by her against the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top