P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, GEORGE VADAKKEL
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MAUY IGNATIUS – Respondent
1. The question referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench is "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Rs. 42,632 being the assessee's share of loss from M/s. Tyre A Rubber Industries, is to be set off against Rs. 50,284 being the share income of the minor children of the assessee from the firm, M/s. Ignatius Mill Stores for the assessment year 1976-77?"
2. That arises on the following facts. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1976-77 the assessee, an individual, was a partner in M/s. Tyre & Rubber Industries and also M/s. Natius Latex Industries. Her two minor children were admitted to the benefits of a partnership, M/s. Ignatius Mill Stores. During the relevant accounting year the assessee's share of loss from M/s. Tyre & Rubber Industries was Rs. 42,636/- and her share of income from M/s. Natius Latex Industries was Rs. 3,764/-. The share income of each of the minor children of the assessee from the firm M/s. Ignatius Mills was Rs. 25,142/-. The assessee filed a return disclosing an income of Rs. 4,200/-. The loss incurred by her in the firm of M/s Tyre & Rubber Industries was set off by her against the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.