SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Ker) 178

SUKUMARAN
SULAIMAN – Appellant
Versus
CHUNAKARA S. M. JAMA ATH – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. A question of general importance arises in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. It relates to the power of a court to appoint a receiver, in proceedings in relation to a Trust under S.92 of the Civil Procedure Code, at a stage before leave to institute the suit is granted.

2. The court below declined to consider a Receiving application at such a stage, as it felt that it had no jurisdiction to deal with such a prayer at a stage before permission is granted by the court and before the proceedings assumed the form of a regular suit. In taking that view, the court below felt bound by the observations of this Court in the decision reported in Achuthan Pillai v. Mohanan Unnithan, 1979 KLT. Short Notes 53 (Case No. 116). The correctness of the view taken by the court below is challenged in the appeal.

3. The skeletal facts necessary for the determination of this legal issue are as follows: The Original Petition, O.P. No. 98 of 1979 was filed seeking leave under S.92 CPC., for instituting a suit against the counter-petitioners, of whom the first is a public Trust of a religious nature. Counter petitioners 2 to 6 are the present office bearers of the Trust It was alleged that the o
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top