1. Questions of some importance in motor vehicles law arise for consideration in these cases. A Regional Transport Authority grants a temporary permit for a route which lies in the region of another Authority. Can the grant be saved for the reasons that the stage carriage for which the temporary permit was granted was operating on a route in the region of the Authority on the basis of a pucca permit already granted by the Authority, the stage carriage can operate on the route for which the temporary permit was granted as a continuation of the route it was already operating and that when the routes covered by the pucca permit and the temporary permit are taken as a whole the major portion of the same lies in the region of the Authority which granted the temporary permit. The further question is whether the application for the temporary permit can be considered as an application to vary the conditions of a permit under S.57 (8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, for short the Act, and the grant of the temporary permit be saved as an extension of the permit even though the procedure insisted by S.57 of the Act for the grant of a permit was not followed by the Authority in ma