K.K.NARENDRAN, KADER
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAN – Respondent
1. These State appeals against acquittal, presented by the Additional Advocate General at a time when admittedly there was no Public Prosecutor appointed for the High Court, have come up for grant of leave under S.378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for short the Code. The question is whether the State Government can direct the Advocate General or the Additional Advocate General to present an appeal under S.378(1) of the Code without appointing them as Public Prosecutors under S 24(1), in view of Art.165 of the Constitution of India and the rules framed by the Government under clauses (2) and (3) of Art.165 of the Constitution as per notification dated 1st November, 1956
2. S.378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 reads:
"378. Appeal in case of acquittal. (1) Save as otherwise provided in subsection (2) and subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (5), the State Government may, in any case, direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an original or appellate order of acquittal passed by any Court other than a High Court or an order of acquittal passed by the Court of Session in revision."
S. 24(1) of the Code reads:
"
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.