SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ker) 194

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, GEORGE VADAKKEL
We-Build Pvt. ltd. – Appellant
Versus
C Kamaleswaran – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This revision arises from a suit for settlement of accounts. The plaintiff estimates that on settlement of accounts a sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- would be due to him. Accordingly he has paid a court fee of Rs. 12,480/-on the plaint One of the contentions raised by the Ist defendant is that the suit has not been properly valued and that the court fee paid is insufficient. On this contest the lower court raised the following question as the 2nd issue in the case:- "whether proper or sufficient court fee has been paid by the plaintiff in respect of the several reliefs sought for in the plaint?"

2. Though S.12 (2) of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 provides that all questions arising from pleas advanced by the defendant relating to proper valuation of the suit and sufficiency of the court fee paid on the plaint 'shall be heard and decided before evidence is recorded affecting such defendant, on the merits of the claim', the lower court did not do so in the instant case, for the reason (as stated by that court) that neither party alerted the court of the said provision or of the requirement to hear and decide issue 2 as a preliminary issue As a result the sui


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top