SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ker) 134

V.KHALID
MUTHAYYAN – Appellant
Versus
MANAGER, KADALUR ESTATE – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Is a school teacher a workman? Such a question two decades ago would have astonished many and irritated some. But today nobody will feel either surprise or astonishment at such a question. This is the metamorphosis that has been brought in the outlook of man in the relationship between employer and employee by the Bangalore Water Supply Case. That case has opened up new vistas in industrial relations which could not have been thought of even when the Industrial Disputes Act was passed. The question posed in this petition is a sequel to some observations in the above judgment.

2. The petitioner was a teacher in the primary school at Kadalur Estate from 7-1-1959. He was dismissed from service with effect from 12-10-1970. His case was that he was a 'workman' as defined in the Industrial Disputes Act (for short the Act). He was employed in the Estate and was included in the check

9. At present I do not have all the materials before me except a layman's information about the functions of a teacher in a school. A finding on evidence would be the proper decision. The petitioner's counsel submits that he should be given an opportunity to adduce evidence. I hold that this reque

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top