SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ker) 111

K.BASKARAN
GOPALAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE OFFICER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner, stated to be the President of the Idikki-Kanhikuzhi Panchayat, has come up to this court with this writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution challenging Ext. P1 notice of the second respondent, the District Panchayat Officer, Idikki, and Exts. P2, P3 and P4 consequential proceedings and orders.

2. Ext P1 is a notice dated 15-11-80 issued by the second respondent to the petitioner purported to be under sub-section (2) of S.54 of the Kerala Panchayats Act, (Act 32 of 1960), for short the Act. The material portion of that notice reads as follows:

"Whereas a notice of intention to make a motion expressing want of confidence in the President of the Idukki-Kanjikurtii Panchayat has been delivered to the District Panchayat Officer, Idukki under Sub-section (2) of S.54 of the Kerala Panchayats Act 1960 (Act 32 of 1960);

now, therefore, under Sub-section (3) of S.54 of the said Act, I, District Panchayat Officer, Idukki, propose to convene a meeting for the consideration of the notice, and hereby give notice that a meeting of the Panchayat shall be held at the Office of the Panchayat on 11-12-1980 at 11.30 A.M. for considering the said motion."

Ext. P2 is th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top