SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ker) 116

M.P.MENON
THANKA – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANI – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Tenants in Rent Control proceedings are the petitioners, and the common respondent, the landlord. The landlord has three buildings in Koorkancherry Panchayat, on the outskirts of Trichur Town, occupied by eleven different tenants. The Rent Control Court allowed her petitions for evicting them on the ground of bona fide requirement to reconstruct, and the decision was upheld by the appellate authority and by the District Court Eight of the tenants have now come up in revision under S.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. In proceedings under sub-section 4 (iv) of S.11 of Act 2 of 1965, the first thing to be looked into by a court is the condition of the building (or buildings). If the condition is such that it needs reconstruction, the next question will be about the bona fide nature of the landlord's requirement. The court has also to satisfy itself that the plan and the licence, if required, are there, that the landlord has the ability to rebuild and that reconstruction is not put forward as a pretext. Severe restrictions are thus imposed on the right of a landlord to reconstruct, in the interests of the tenants; and the three provisos add to their rigour. Still the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top