SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Ker) 1

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, K.BASKARAN
ABUBAKER – Appellant
Versus
KUNHAVARAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The appellant was not a party in the original petition before the learned single judge, but being aggrieved by the judgment the appellant has been granted leave to file this appeal.

2. The petitioners in the original petition were candidates for election to the managing committee of the Nediyiruppu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. The appellant herein was also a candidate. The returning officer for such election, the 1st respondent in the original petition was taking steps to conduct the election on 26-9-81. On that day polling commenced at 8 A M. in four booths. While the polling was being conducted at about 9 A. M. some persons obstructed the polling and unauthorisedly entered the booths. Since the polling was interrupted by such conduct the 1st respondent returning officer stopped the polling in exercise of the powers conferred under R.35(3)(p) of the Co-op. Societies Rules, which reads:

"35

(3)

(p) if at any stage of the polling the proceedings are interrupted or obstructed by any riot or affray or if at such elections it is not possible to take the poll for any sufficient cause, the returning officer shall have power to stop the polling, recording his reasons for such an ac





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top