SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Ker) 94

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, K.K.NARENDRAN
DEVAKI AMMA – Appellant
Versus
KUNHI RAMAN NAIR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The plaintiffs in O.S.No. 37 of 1973 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court. Tellicherry are the appellants in this appeal. They instituted the suit for partition and recovery of possession of 10/14 shares in the plaint B schedule properties on the basis that they belonged to an undivided tavazhy consisting of the plaintiffs and the defendants. The defendants contended that items Nos. I and 2 of the plaint B schedule alone belonged to the tavazhy and are available for partition and that the remaining items included in the plaint B schedule are the separate acquisitions and that the tavazhy has no right, title or interest in the rest of the properties included in the plaint B schedule. It was also contended by the defendants that the plaintiffs are barred by res judicata from putting forward the plea that plaint items Nos. 3 to 15 are tavazhy properties by reason of the decision rendered by the Munsiff's Court,

Koothuparamba in O.S. No 149 of 1961 as per the judgment and decree evidenced by Exts B3 and B2, that only plaint B schedule items Nos.1 and 2 belonged to the tavazhy and that the remaining items included in the plaint schedule are not tavazhy properties.

2















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top