SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Ker) 112

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, G.BALAGANGADHARAN NAIR
SPL. DY. TAHSILDAR, MANJERI – Appellant
Versus
KUNJU MOIDEEN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This writ appeal has been preferred by respondents Nos 1 to 3 in O. P. No. 4233 of 1976 Special Deputy Tahsildar, Manjeri, Circle Forest Conservator. Calicut and the Divisional Forest Officer, Nilambur Division, Nilambur against the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court allowing the said writ petition filed by the respondent herein and quashing the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against him in purported exercise of the powers conferred by S.68 of the Revenue Recovery Act for realisation of an amount of Rs. 3,150/- said to represent the loss sustained by the Forest Department on account of resale of the right to raise Punam cultivation on certain lands, which was necessitated by the default committed by the writ petitioner in paying the balance of the bid amount, for which the said right had been formally knocked down in his favour, and in executing the necessary written agreement.

2. The learned single Judge held that since the amount sought to be recovered was not money due to the Government under a written agreement executed by the writ petitioner, the resort taken to the power conferred by S.68 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act was unwarranted.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top