1. The petitioner in Crl. R. P. No. 167 of 1977 is the wife of the 1st petitioner in Crl. R.P. No. 183 of 1977. The other petitioner in Crl. R.P.No.183 of 1977 is the son of the Ist petitioner therein. The petitioner in Crl. R.P. No. 167 of 1977 filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjeri. After recording her statement but not of any witness, presumably because none was present, the Magistrate issued process. He then transferred the case to the II Class Magistrate, Malappuram. The accused were summoned before that court. That court committed the case to the Court of Session, Manjeri. The Sessions Court discharged the accused under S.227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as but for 'the bald allegations in the Complaint and the complainant's interested sworn statement there is nothing on record to show that the accused have committed the offences alleged.' The father and son, the petitioners in Crl. R.P. No. 183 of 1977, are the accused in a complaint in respect of the same transaction, delivery of immovable property pursuant to a partition decree filed by one of the accused in the other case an Amin attached to the District Court, Manjeri. Sinc