SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ker) 24

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
BHASKARA MENON – Appellant
Versus
K. S. R. T. CORPORATION – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The writ petitioner is a retired employee of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation in its Water Transport section. He had been working as Assistant Traffic Inspector, in the water transport section at Ernakulam during 1963 to 1978.

2. The Traffic Inspector on duty at Ernakulam died early in 1964, and the petitioner had been directed to look after the duties of the Traffic Inspector also in addition to his normal duties as Assistant Traffic Inspector. This is seen from the orders Ext. P1 and P2 issued by the Water Transport officer in June, 1964 and August, 1964 respectively.

3. An Industrial dispute between the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation and its workmen was referred for arbitration in 1967 under S.10A of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter called the Act). The Writ petitioner also participated in the Arbitration Proceedings, which was conducted by Sri G. Kumara Pillai, a retired judge of this court who had been appointed as Arbitrator in the matter. The petitioner had claimed before the Arbitrator that he was entitled to be paid additional emoluments for the period during which he was in charge of the duties of Traffic Inspector in addition to h












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top