SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Ker) 195

G.VISWANATHA.IYER
MAHADEVA IYER – Appellant
Versus
BHAGAVATHY AMMAL – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. In respect of certain properties belonging to the Anchal Brahmana Samooham suo motu proceedings for assignment of right, title and interest of the Samooham were taken by the Land Tribunal on the basis of a report filed by the Village Officer and the Revenue Inspector. SMP. 107 of 1974 was taken in respect of 71 cents of dry land in Sy. No. 89/6, Anchal Village. SMP. 109 of 1974 was taken in respect of 1 acre and 6 cents of wet land and 21 cents of Panappurayidom in Sy. No, 48/2A, 2B. 442/1 and 38/13C of the same Village. SMP. 67/75 was taken in respect of 54 cents of double crop land in Sy. No. 552/1 AB, Arakkal Village and SMP. 68/75 was taken in respect of 80 cents of double crop wet land in Sy. No. 552/1A and 553/ 7 of the same Village. The Land Tribunal after enquiry found that the occupants of the above lands are not tenants within the meaning of the Kerala Land Reforms Act and therefore refused to order assignment of the lands to them. A. A. No. 333 of 1976 was filed against the order in SMP. 107/ 74, A. A. 263 of 1975 was filed against SMP. 109 of 1974, A. A. 697 of 1975 was filed against the decision in SMP. 67/75 and A. A. No. 961/75 was filed against the de
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top