G.VISWANATHA.IYER
MAHADEVA IYER – Appellant
Versus
BHAGAVATHY AMMAL – Respondent
1. In respect of certain properties belonging to the Anchal Brahmana Samooham suo motu proceedings for assignment of right, title and interest of the Samooham were taken by the Land Tribunal on the basis of a report filed by the Village Officer and the Revenue Inspector. SMP. 107 of 1974 was taken in respect of 71 cents of dry land in Sy. No. 89/6, Anchal Village. SMP. 109 of 1974 was taken in respect of 1 acre and 6 cents of wet land and 21 cents of Panappurayidom in Sy. No, 48/2A, 2B. 442/1 and 38/13C of the same Village. SMP. 67/75 was taken in respect of 54 cents of double crop land in Sy. No. 552/1 AB, Arakkal Village and SMP. 68/75 was taken in respect of 80 cents of double crop wet land in Sy. No. 552/1A and 553/ 7 of the same Village. The Land Tribunal after enquiry found that the occupants of the above lands are not tenants within the meaning of the Kerala Land Reforms Act and therefore refused to order assignment of the lands to them. A. A. No. 333 of 1976 was filed against the order in SMP. 107/ 74, A. A. 263 of 1975 was filed against SMP. 109 of 1974, A. A. 697 of 1975 was filed against the decision in SMP. 67/75 and A. A. No. 961/75 was filed against the de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.