1. The perennial, nagging problem of delegated legislation and the so-called Henry VIII clause have again come up for decision in this appeal by the State of Kerala. S.60 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act 1932 and a notification issued under that provision were struck down by the High Court of Kerala on the ground of unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. Certain consequential directions were issued by the High Court. Those directions have long since worked themselves out and so the party who invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art.226 of the Constitution has no longer any surviving interest. The State of Kerala is however, interested in sustaining the validity of S.60 and has filed this appeal.

2. Lawyers and judges have never ceased to be interested in the question of delegated legislation and since the Delhi Laws Act case, we have been blessed (?) by an abundance of authority, the blessing not necessarily unmixed. We do not wish, in this case, to search for the precise principles decided in the Delhi Laws Act case, nor to consider whether N. K. Papieh & Sons v. Excise Commissioner (1975) 3 SCR. 607 beats the final retreat from the earlie