SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Ker) 144

K.BASKARAN
BALAKRISNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner during the material time was a Subject Matter Specialist (Agronomy). He and a colleague of his, Sri Bhaskara Kurup, were placed under suspension by G O E T No.1059/73/AD. dated 5 5 1973. This was followed by Ext. P-1 memorandum of charges dated 7 91973 with the statement of allegations attached thereto. Ext. P-2 is the copy of the answer to the memorandum of charges and statement of allegations, submitted by the petitioner on 3-1-1974 to the second respondent, the Director of Agriculture, Trivandrum. The second respondent accepting the finding of the Joint Director of Agriculture, Trivandrum, who enquired into the charges levelled against the petitioner, passed Ext. P3 order dated 7-12-1974 stopping the next increment of the petitioner for one year with cumulative effect. Ext P-4 is the copy of the memorandum of appeal filed by the petitioner on 5-2-1975; and Ext. P-5 is order No. G.O. Rt. 3128/75/Ad dated 11-11-1975 passed by the first respondent, the Government of Kerala, disposing of Ext. P-4 appeal, confirming Ext. P-3 order passed by the second respondent. It is aggrieved by Exts. P-3 and P-5 orders that this writ petition under Art.226 of the Con














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top