SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Ker) 65

GOPALAN NAMBIYAR, T.KOCHU THOMMEN
RAGHAVAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
SAINABA BEEVI – Respondent


Judgment :-

The appeal is against the judgment of at learned judge of this Court, decreeing the plaintiff's suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from conducting the'Viruthikulangara Wine Stores' in the plaint schedule building or from using the building for any purpose other than that for which it was let, viz. for conducting a gold trade. The trial court, the Munsiff of Kottayam dismissed the suit. The Appellate Judge viz, the Subordinate Judge, Kottayam decreed the suit; and the learned judge in Second Appeal, sustained the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court. He, however, grant d leave to appeal, which had occasioned this further appeal:

2. The judgment of the learned judge was on 31st January, 1977, and leave to appeal was granted the same day on oral request of the appellants herein. The learned Advocate General appearing for the plaintiff-respondent raised the preliminary objection that the appeal is not maintainable. Under S.5(iii) of the Kerala High Court act, 1959 an appeal shall lie to a Bench of judges, from a judgment of a single judge, in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction, in respect of a decree or order made, in the exercise of a




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top