SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Ker) 250

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, G.BALAGANGADHARAN NAIR
SREEDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMED KUNHI – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Respondent who is the landlord applied for evicting the petitioner-tenant under S.11 (2) (b) of the Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (which we will call the Act for short) on the ground that he was in arrears of rent. On February 26, 1974 the petitioner deposited in the Rent Control Court the rent till the end of that month for payment to the respondent However on February 28, 1974 the Rent Control Court passed an order of eviction on the ground that the amount deposited was insufficient as it did not cover the costs of the proceedings, adding a rider within S.11 (2) (c) that the petitioner could get the order vacated by making up the deficit amount within one month. The petitioner did not do this within the time but made an application I. A. 192 (A)/74 for vacating the order only on June 1, 1974, supporting it with an affidavit explaining the circumstances which led to the delay. He also deposited Rs. 3710 being the costs and the rent up to date The Rent Control Court dismissed the application in the view that it had no power to condone the delay and allow the application, as it was made only after the period of one month had expired This conclusion has been c










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top