GEORGE VADAKKEL
SETHU LAKSHMI BAYI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
1. The former Ruler, Maharaja of Travancore, sanctioned an annual payment of Rs. 75,000/- from 611 1931 to the petitioner who ruled that State as Regent from 191924 to 6111931. Admittedly payments were made in equal monthly instalments till 26 2 -1972; thereafter payments were stopped. This is a motion for mandamus to enforce continued payments.
2. By Ext. P5 letter the Chief Secretary of Travancore State informed the Accounts Officer of that State about the said sanction; Art.523 of the Travancore Financial and Account Code, Vol. I, Chapter XIV (Ext. P6) also evidences the sanction of the said sum and its allotment; Ext. P9 is the copy of the letter whereby petitioner was informed of the sanctioning of the said sum as an'allowance'; in Ext. P7 receipt petitioner refers to the amount as pension; in Exts. P11 to P13 letters the Comptroller of Travancore-Cochin also refers to the payments as pension; Exts. P12 and P13 show that the payments were debited under the head: '54 (A) Territorial and Political Pensions'.
3. It was argued that it was the 'duty and obligation of the Ruler of Travancore State' to pay this amount to the petitioner, and that this duty and obligation dev
Relied on AIR 1971 SC 1409; 1976 I SCWR 327; AIR 1968 SC 1063; 1964 Ker.123
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.