Judges : P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
BALAKRISHNA KURUP - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER - Respondent
Case No : C. R. P. No. 1517 of 1975
Decided On : 09/04/1976
Advocates Appeared :
T. R. Govinda Warriyar; K. Ramakumar; For Petitioner Government Pleader; For Respondents
Minor Child - Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963 - Chapter III - S.82(1) - S.83 - S.2(14) - S.2(36A) - The court discussed the determination of the ceiling area permitted to be held by a person and surrender of land in excess over the ceiling area under the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963. The court considered the definition of 'family' under the Act and whether an unborn child could be considered a member of the family for the purpose of increasing the ceiling area. The court examined legal provisions and interpretations related to the recognition of unborn children in law, particularly under Hindu law, Muslim law, and English law. The court concluded that an unborn child cannot be considered a minor child for the purpose of calculating the ceiling area under the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the determination of the ceiling area permitted to be held by a person and surrender of land in excess over the ceiling area under the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963. The specific question was whether an unborn child could be considered a member of the family for the purpose of increasing the ceiling area.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that an unborn child cannot be considered a minor child for the purpose of calculating the ceiling area under the Act. The court discussed legal provisions and interpretations related to the recognition of unborn children in law, particularly under Hindu law, Muslim law, and English law.
Issues: The main issue was whether an unborn child could be considered a member of the family for the purpose of increasing the ceiling area under the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that age is reckoned only from birth, and therefore, a child not yet born cannot be considered a child below the age of 18 years. The court concluded that an unborn child cannot be considered a minor child for the purpose of calculating the ceiling area under the Act.
Final Decision: The Original Petition was dismissed, and the parties were directed to suffer costs.
1. Can a child in utero be said to be a minor child? When a woman conceives could it be said that even before the delivery the unborn in the womb is a minor child of such mother? This interesting question arises in this case in the following circumstances:
2. Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) provides, in Chapter III, for the determination of the ceiling area permitted to be held by a person and surrender of land in excess over the ceiling area. The ceiling is determined with reference to a family, an adult unmarried person, or any other person. The family as defined in the Act is an artificial unit consisting of a husband wife and unmarried minor children. The properties of the members of the family are treated as that of the family for the purpose of determining the ceiling area. If any of the members of the family owns or holds land or a share in land which is joint property that is treated as the land of the family for the purpose of Chapter III. It is not as if this provision is intended to alter the right of the individual members of the family to the lands assumed to be that of the family for the purpose of determining the ceiling area. The rights in the land continue as before. But the deeming provision in the Act by which the lands belonging to each one of the members of the family as defined in the Act are treated as that of the family is only for the determination of the extent of the land held by such family for the purpose of surrender and for directing surrender of excess land. Ceiling limit is fixed under S.82(1) of the Act for a family consisting of two or more but not more than 5 members as 10 standard acres. Where the members of a family consist of more than 5 the ceiling area in standard acres will be larger. Therefore the more the members the larger the ceiling area in standard acres. The property may belong to the father, to the mother or to one of the minor children and may continue to be so. But for the limited purpose of determining the area that is held by the family the property is taken to be that of the family and if there is excess the family has to surrender. The question that has arisen for determination in this case is whether a family could claim that a child born after 1-1-1970 but conceived at that time could claim to be a member of the family so as to increase the ceiling area by one more standard acre. 1-1-1970 is the date notified under S.83 of the Act, the date on which the surrender provision became operative. The Taluk Land Board, Tirur, against whose order this revision is filed has held the view that an unborn child is not a minor child who should be taken as a member of the family in determining the ceiling area of the land that could be held by a family. But learned counsel Sri. T. R. Govinda Warrier canvasses for the position that even an unborn child has a legal personality, that it has rights recognised by law and therefore must be treated as a child and so long as it has not attained the age of 18 it is to be further qualified as a minor child and if so it should be reckoned as a member of a family defined in S.2(14) of the Act as meaning husband, wife and unmarried children. Unmarried of course, it is, but is it a child and that a minor child.?
3. I do not think the enquiry into this case should lead me to consider whether an unborn child is a legal personality. Not that it is difficult to answer, for, except for certain limited purposes law has not recognised an unborn child as the same in all respects as a child born. For certain purposes the existence of a child en ventre sa mere has been recognised in law. Under the Hindu law the right of a child born subsequent to a partition to reopen the partition under certain circumstances is recognised. So is the case with the right to have a share set apart even when the child is in the womb. This is a peculiar incidence of the Hindu law which recognises a right by birth to children in ancest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.