SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ker) 87

T.CHANDRASEKHARA MENON
M. G. GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SUBSIDIARY INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, KOHIMA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. An order of termination of service of a constable in the service of Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau is questioned in this O. P. It is not disputed that the order concerned marked as Ex-P3 in the case was passed by the Asst. Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau, Kohima, Nagaland and served on the petitioner in Nagaland. But the amount due to the petitioner, viz., the sum equivalent to the amount of his pay plus allowances for the period of notice, which is one month as per R.5 of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules is paid to him only in Kerala.

2. A preliminary objection was taken to the maintainability of the petition by the learned Central Government Pleader contending that the whole cause of action for the petition has arisen out of the State and, therefore, the O. P. is not maintainable in this court. As per the amendment of Art.226 of the Constitution of India by the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, the power conferred by the said Article to issue directions, orders or writs to any government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top