Judges : G.VISWANATHA IYER,V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
K.J.Sahadevan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : Crl. M.P. Nos. 993 of 1975, 995 of 1975, 997 of 1975 and 1001 of 1975
Decided On : 01/01/1976
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner: M. Krishnan Nair and N. A. Augustine, Advocates. For the Respondent: State Prosecutor.
Public Servant - Liability under Prevention of Corruption Act - S. 5(1)(c) and (d) read with S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and S. 408 and 409 I.P.C. - S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code as amended by the Kerala Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1962 - S. 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act - Ss. 162 to 165 and 165-A I.P.C. - Employees of co-operative societies deemed to be public servants - Jurisdiction of the Special Judge
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, employees of co-operative societies, were accused of offences under S. 5(1)(c) and (d) read with S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and S. 408 and 409 I.P.C. They raised a preliminary objection that they are not public servants liable to be proceeded against under the mentioned sections.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the employees of co-operative societies are deemed to be public servants under the amended provisions of S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and S. 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Therefore, the Special Judge had jurisdiction to proceed with the trial of the cases.
Issues: The main issue was whether the employees of co-operative societies could be considered public servants under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the amended provisions of S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and S. 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which deemed employees of co-operative societies to be public servants for the purpose of the mentioned sections. The court also emphasized that the scope of the definition of 'public servant' had been substantially widened by the amendments.
Final Decision: The Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions were dismissed, affirming the jurisdiction of the Special Judge to proceed with the trial of the cases.
BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J.
The petitioners in these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are employees of certain co-operative societies. They are figuring as accused in certain cases now pending trial before the Special Judge, Trivandrum wherein the petitioners stand charged for offences under S. 5(1)(c) and (d) read with S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and S. 408 I.P.C. The petitioner in Criminal M.P. 1001 of 1975 is also facing a charge under Section 409 I.P.C. before the Special Judge When those cases were taken up for trial by the Special Judge a preliminary objection was raised on behalf of these accused that they are not public servants liable to be proceeded against either under S. 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act or under S. 409 I.P.C. and that hence the Court of the Special Judge has no jurisdiction to try the cases. By separate but similar orders the learned Special Judge overruled the said contention and held that he has jurisdiction to proceed with the trial of the cases. These Miscellaneous Petitions have been preferred against the said decision rendered by the Special Judge on the preliminary point raised before him.
2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners placed strong reliance on the decision reported in Arunachalam v. State of Kerala (1974 Ker LT 7) wherein a learned single Judge of this Court has observed that the Secretary of a Co-operative Society cannot be said to be a public servant inasmuch as he does not come within any of the categories of officers mentioned in clauses (1) to (9), (11) and (12) of S. 21 I.P.C. and that the evidence in that case did not also establish that the Secretary of the particular Co-operative Society came within the description contained in clause (10) of S. 21 I.P.C. In our opinion this decision is not of any assistance to the petitioners in these cases nor can it be treated as an authority laying down that a Secretary or any other employee of a Co-operative Society cannot be regarded as a 'public servant' for the purpose of any of the provisions of the Indian Penal Code. The only provisions of the Indian Penal Code which fell to be considered by the learned Judge in that case was S. 409 and as we understand the decision what was held therein was only that on the evidence adduced in that case it would not be said that the duties of the Secretary of the particular co-operative society concerned in the case were such as to fall within the description contained in clause (10) of S. 21.
3. By Ss. 2 and 3 of the Kerala Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1962 - Act 27 of 1962 - S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code was amended by inserting the following explanation:-
"Public Servant" - For purpose of this section and Ss. 162, 163, 164, 165 and 165-A, the words 'public servant' shall denote, besides those who are public servants under S. 21 or who are deemed to be 'public servants' within the meaning of that section under any law for the time being in force, persons falling under any of the descriptions hereinafter following namely :-
(i) Every officer in the service or pay of the Travancore Devaswom Board or the Cochin Devaswom Board;
(ii) Every officer in the service or pay and every member of the Wakfs Board constituted under the Wakf Act, 1954 (Central Act, 29 of 1954);
(iii) The President and every member of a Village Court or Village Panchayat Court;
(iv) Every member of the Board of Directors or of the executive or managing committee and every officer or servant of a co-operative society registered or deemed to be registered under the law relating to co-operative societies for the time being in force;
(v) Every member of the governing body and every officer or servant in the service or pay of a society registered under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955 or the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and receiving aid or grant from the Government;
(vi) Every teacher or other officer or servant of the University o
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.