SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Ker) 198

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
RAGHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. A rather interesting question has arisen for decision in this case. That concerns the construction of S.87 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act and may be of importance as a question of common occurrence in future. When any land is exempt from the provisions of Chapter III of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, as land falling within the exempted categories specified in S.81(1) of the Act, whether a subsequent conversion of that land into a non-exempt category obliges the owner to surrender land as excess under S.87 of the Act denning such land as a quired on the date of conversion? Private forest is a category of land exempted from the ceiling provisions of the Act. If on 1-1-1964 the land was private forest it is exempt from the ceiling provisions on 1-1-1970 and therefore irrespective of the extent of such private forest held by a person on 1-1-1970 he can hold other land to the extent of the maximum permissible ceiling area. If such a person subsequently acquires land other than that in the exempted category he is liable under S 87 of the Act to surrender the excess arising by reason of such acquisition. That is provided for in order to prevent accumulation of lands in






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top