P.JANAKI AMMA
KANAKAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SIVASANKARAN NAIR – Respondent
1. The petitioner in an application filed under S.11 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act (for Short 'the Act') has filed this revision petition. The respondent was a tenant of a building belonging to him. An order of eviction was passed by the Rent Control Court, Trivandrum on 19 21974 on the ground that the respondent made default of payment of rent and also on the ground that the building was required by the petitioner for the purpose of reconstruction. The respondent claimed Kudikidappu right in respect of the building. The matter was referred to the Land Tribunal who held that the building was not a hut. An order of eviction was passed in due course which was confirmed in appeal A revision petition was filed under S.20 of the Act before the District Court. The District Court confirmed the order of the Rent Control Court and the Appellate authority. The respondent preferred C.R.P. 1418 of 1974 before this Court challenging the finding of the Rent Control Court and the appellate authority and the District Court regarding her alleged Kudikidappu right. This Court dismissed the revision petition but allowed time to vacate the building. After the disposal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.