SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Ker) 127

G.BALAGANGADHARAN NAIR
RAMAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAN NAIR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Appellant was the second defendant in a suit for enforcement of a right of pre-emption, which has been decreed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kasargod reversing its dismissal by the learned Munsiff, Kasargod.

2. Plaintiff is the brother of the first defendant. By an agreement (muchalika) Ext. XI dated 2101964 they and their two brothers and two sisters appointed PW. 3, an Advocate who is also their relation, as arbitrator to partition the properties which they had inherited from their father. On 2/8/1965 PW. 3 passed his award Ext. Al dividing the properties among the sharers and allotting the suit property, among other items, to the first defendant. The parties have accepted the partition and have taken their shares in terms of Ext. Al. Ext. Al which has been registered but has not been filed in court as required by the Arbitration Act, provides in Para.8 for a right of pre-emption in the following terms:

"Every sharer will have a right of preemption in respect of the properties allowed to the other sharer provided such sharer exercising the rights of pre-emption shall have the property allotted to him under the award contiguous to the property in respect of which



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top