SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Ker) 191

Judges : T.CHANDRASEKHARA MENON
ST.GEORGE JACOBITE SYRIAN CHURCH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 3599 of 1975
Decided On : 09/24/1975
Advocates Appeared :
T. P. Mathai; For Petitioner Government Pleader; For Respondents 1 & 2 V. Gopalakrishna Pillai; For Respondent 3

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the term 'school' in R.6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal by Auction) Rules includes a 'Sunday School', thereby prohibiting the location of a toddy shop within 400 meters from the Sunday School.

Headnote:

Toddy Shop - Proximity to Sunday School - Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal by Auction) Rules - R.6(2) - The court considered the validity of the order quashing the petition filed by the church against the functioning of a sub-shop of a toddy shop near the Sunday School. The court interpreted R.6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal by Auction) Rules, which prohibits the location of a toddy shop within 400 meters from any school, and held that the term 'school' includes a 'Sunday School'. The court set aside the order and directed the authority to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The Jacobite Syrian Church filed a petition to quash the order rejecting their complaint against the functioning of a sub-shop of a toddy shop near their Sunday School. The school is compulsory in the church and is conducted in a building near the toddy shop.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order rejecting the petition was made in violation of R.6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal by Auction) Rules, as the term 'school' includes a 'Sunday School'. The court set aside the order and directed the authority to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law.

Issues: The main issue was whether the order rejecting the petition was in violation of R.6(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal by Auction) Rules, considering the proximity of the toddy shop to the Sunday School.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the term 'school' in R.6(2) to include a 'Sunday School', thereby prohibiting the location of a toddy shop within 400 meters from the Sunday School.

Final Decision: The court set aside the order and directed the authority to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law.

Judgment :-

1. This Writ Petition filed on behalf of a Jacobite Syrian Church, by its Vicar and Trustees seeks to quash Ext. P-2 order passed by the Asst. Excise Commissioner, Ernakulam, the 2nd respondent rejecting the petition filed by the petitioners, complaining against the functioning of the sub-shop of Thrikkalathoor (Payipra) toddy shop, just near the St. Thomas Sunday school, conducted by the petitioner-church. This School is being conducted in building No. P. 11204, situated on the eastern side of a public road. The sunday school was started in 1956.

2. There are 70 students, alleged to be attending the classes run from 1 to 5 P. M., on every Sunday. There are said to be 7 classes and the students attending the school are of the age group from five years to sixteen years. The instruction given in the Sunday School is regarding religious matters, according to the syllabus approved by the Malankara Sunday School Association. Annual examinations are conducted under the supervision of the said association and certificates issued to the students who come out successful in the examination. It is alleged in the petition that Sunday School education is compulsory in the Jacobite Syrian Church and the Holy Sacraments like solemnization of marriage etc., can be refused by the Church to those who do not produce certificates showing that they have undergone education in Sunday School.

The building where the Sunday School is being run is also said to be used by the members of the church on every Saturday at 5 P. M. for conducting prayer; there will also be speeches on religious subjects.

3. The third respondent bid in auction the right to run the toddy shop No. 39 for a period of one year from 141975 to 313 1976. He made an application to the second respondent for licence to run a sub-shop of the main shop in building No. PII, 205 which is situated adjacent to the Sunday School building, on the same side of the road. The distance between the two buildings is below 20 feet. In this building, it is said, a sub shop was sanctioned during 1974-75 which caused disturbance to the Sunday School. The church filed several petitions before the authorities including the Minister concerned. Some enquiries were conducted in the matter by Circle Inspector of Excise. Kothamangalam, who made a report about the same to the superior authorities. It is alleged in the petition that the petitioner had been assured by the Range Officer of Excise, Muvattupuzha that for the financial year 1975-76 sub shop will not be sanctioned in the building No. P. 11205.

4. When the petitioner came to know about the application by the third respondent for licence for sub shop in the building concerned for the financial year 1975-76, a petition was filed on behalf of the church before the second respondent on 4 41975 objecting to the grant of the licence. The second respondent passed an order dated 4 41975, directing the Circle Inspector of Excise, Kothamangalam and Range Officer, Muvattupuzha to see that no sub shop functioned in objectionable distance from the Sunday School. The petitioner alleges, by virtue of the above direction the sub shop which was being run in anticipation of the licence in the building concerned was stopped on 6 41975 and the same was removed to building No. PI 295 which is situated about a furlong from the Sunday School on the opposite side of the same road. However, it would appear, that the third respondent obtained a licence for a sub shop in building No. P-II 205. Therefore, the petitioner filed a petition dated 17 71975 before the third respondent objecting to the grant of the licence. When the third respondent again started sub shop, the petitioner made enquiries at the office of the second respondent and then the order was served on the petitioner, which order is impugned in this Original Petition.

5. The said order, Ext. P2, states that "Sunday School is not a school for the purpose of R.6 of Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal by Auction Rules,







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top