SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Ker) 28

Judges : P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
PADMANABHA IYER - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 1634 of 1971
Decided On : 02/18/1974
Advocates Appeared :
K. S. Rajamony; S. Parameswaran; A. Shahul Hameed; For Petitioner Government Pleader; For Respondent

The main legal point established is the requirement for fair trial safeguards and proper enquiry in adjudication under the Kerala Public Accountants Act, 1963, to ensure the exercise of powers with judicial process and fairness.

Headnote:

Kerala Public Accountants Act, 1963 - Adjudication Powers - Fair Trial - Judicial Process

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a former store-keeper, was asked to show cause for alleged fraud and defalcation. He deposited amounts under protest and was later served with a notice to pay a sum under the Kerala Public Accountants Act, 1963. The Revenue Divisional Officer's order was based on the Chief Engineer's report without proper enquiry or decision.

Finding of the Court:

The court emphasized the need for fair procedure and proper enquiry in adjudication under the Act. It highlighted the limitations and duty of authorities to exercise powers fairly and with judicial process.

Issues: The issues revolved around the proper exercise of adjudication powers under the Kerala Public Accountants Act, 1963, and the lack of fair procedure and enquiry in the Revenue Divisional Officer's order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stressed the importance of fair trial safeguards and the duty of authorities to conduct proper enquiries and provide reasonable opportunities to parties in adjudication under the Act.

Final Decision: The court quashed the Revenue Divisional Officer's order and allowed the Original Petition, emphasizing the need for proper application of the Act and issuing appropriate instructions for its administration.

Judgment :-

1. The Kerala Public Accountants Act, 1963 gives large powers to the Collector in the matter of adjudicating claims against persons employed in the service of the Government or of any authority or institution notified in this behalf who satisfy the definition of 'public accountant' in the said Act. It enables the Collector to demand of the Public accountant, to deliver monies, securities for money, documents or other property which, according to the Collector, or Head of the Department or other authority or institution notified, the public accountant is bound to deliver. The public accountant may, on receipt of notice object to the demand. In that case the Collector is in duty bound to enquire into the objections and record a decision. If such decision is against the public accountant or if the public accountant does not object to the claim powers of recovery from the public servant are provided under the Act. Parties aggrieved by the order passed in proceedings under the Act could sue the Government or authority or institution in civil courts by instituting suit within one year from the time the cause of action arises.

2. Normally, the process of adjudication of civil claims is left to the civil court. The Code of Civil Procedure which governs proceedings in civil courts embodies very many safeguards which enables the parties to expect a fair trial. A fair trial necessarily involves safeguards, both by way of securing to parties sufficient opportunity to place materials which support their case and also the guarantee that such materials would be properly looked into and an objective decision reached. The provision as to issue of summons, filing of written statements, calling for additional statements, if any, framing of issues, giving opportunities to the parties to file documents and list of witnesses, summoning and examining witnesses, giving opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and hearing parties after evidence is closed are all necessary ingredients of the fair procedure requisite for reaching a proper decision in any case. When powers of adjudication which result in consequences more or less similar to the consequence of decrees passed by civil courts are vested in authorities such as the Collector under the Public Accountants Act, such powers should be exercised with considerable care and deliberation and the conferment of such powers could be protected from attack against their validity only on the assumption that the powers would be exercised fairly and in a manner acceptable to" judicial conscience. The authorities under the Kerala Public Accountants Act will do well to remember these limitations, the limitations which must be read in to the powers conferred on them by the provisions of the Act. It is quite often seen that power under this and similar enactments are exercised evidently without being conscious of the fact that the adjudications between the parties visit them with serious consequences and therefore must be by the exercise of a judicial mind and by the employment of a judicial process.

3. A notice issued under the provisions of the Kerala Public Accountants Act could be objected to by the person to whom it is issued. If the claim is disputed it has necessarily to be enquired into. S.3 mentions only that the Collector "shall enquire into the objection and record a decision." The brevity of the language of the section is not intended to invest arbitrary powers with the Collector. On the other band, the very fact that the section gives such large powers to the Collector imposes on him the duty of properly conducting the enquiry after giving the parties sufficient and reasonable opportunity to meet the case against them and after giving them an occasion to place their case fairly and squarely before the Collector. Parties should be notified of the dates on which the enquiry is to be held and holding of the enquiry necessarily means that opportunity should be given to the parties to whom notices








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top