SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Ker) 115

V.P.GOPALAN NAMBIYAR
BOARD OF REVENUE – Appellant
Versus
P. K. SYED AKBAR SAHIB – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. On 111969, judgment was delivered by one of us in O.P. No. 390 of 1967 allowing the petition and directing refund to the 'petitioner of a sum of Rs. 30,5000/- collected from him as licence-fee for the years 1952 to 1957 under the Travancore Tobacco Act 1 of 1087 M. E. The levy and collection of Tobacco tax under the Act had been declared illegal by the Supreme Court in Abdulkhader's case (1962 KLJ. 625) on the ground that the rules of 1950 and 1951 which authorised the levy and collection and which contained the charging provisions, had no independent existence after the implied repeal of the Tobacco Act by the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. Thereupon, the Kerala State Legislature passed the Validation Act 9 of 1964 (called Luxury Tax Act, for short) validating the levy and collection of the tax, as a tax on luxuries. The Validation Act was challenged in this Court. It was sustained by a learned judge, in the first instance. On appeal, a Division Bench by judgment in Writ Appeal No. 5070 of 1965 etc. dated 3101966, held that it violated the provisions of Art.301 of the Constitution. On further appeal by the State to the Supreme Court, the decision of the Division














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top