SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Ker) 41

V.P.GOPALAN NAMBIYAR
RAVI KALYANI AMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KANJIKUZHY – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This writ petition raises the question as to whether a Land Tribunal constituted under the Kerala Land Reforms Act (Act I of 1964) has got the power of reviewing its own order; and if so, whether the said power can be exercised without notice to the party affected by the order. I do not propose to decide the first of these questions, as this case can safely be disposed of on the second. The order impugned in this case is Ext. P3 dated 15th February 1972, by which the Land Tribunal reviewed its prior order dated 31-10-1970 passed under S.80-B of the Land Reforms Act, dismissing the 2nd Respondent's application to purchase the kudikidappu rights. Subsequently, on an application filed for review of the said order, the Land Tribunal passed Ext. P3 order, condoning the delay in submitting the review petition, allowing the application for review, and posting the case for filing written statement. The petitioner has alleged that be had no notice at all either of the application for review or of the application to excuse delay in filing the same. I am clear that, whether there was power at all in the Land Tribunal to review its own order, the said power cannot certainly be e


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top