SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ker) 70

SIKRI, J.M.SHELAT, DUA, KHANNA, MITTER
KUNJUKUTTY SAHIB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. hese are 43 appeals (C. As. Nos. 143, 274, 309 and 203 to 242 of 1971), 40 appeals (C. As. Nos. 203 to 242 of 1971), being by the State of Kerala and the Land Board and the remaining three by some of the writ petitioners in the High Court. Most of the. material provisions of the amended Kerala Land Reforms Act, Act. No.1 of 1964 (hereinafter called the impugned Act) were challenged in the High Court as violative of Art.14, 19, 25, 26 and 31 of the Constitution. Quite a number of writ petitions, however, assailed the entire impugned Act on that score. The sole defence in sustaining the constitutional validity of the impugned Act was based on Art.31 A of the Constitution. The High Court struck down several provisions of the impugned Act. In the State appeals (C. As. Nos. 203 to 242 of 1971) the judgment of the High Court is questioned only in so far as it struck down S.73 and Explanation to S 85 (1) of the impugned Act. The judgment appealed from is reported as V. N. Narayanan Nair v. State of Kerala (1970 KLT. 659). Raman Nayar C.J., and Raghavan J., expressed their conclusions through the Chief Justice thus:

'In the result we declare the following provisions of the Ac

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top