SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ker) 75

Judges : P.GOVINDA NAIR,P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
R.PRABHAKARAN NAIR AND OTHERS - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 1022, 4790 of 1970
Decided On : 05/25/1972
Advocates Appeared :
K. Chandrasekharan; T. Chandrasekhara Menon; For Petitioners Government Pleader; For Respondents

The power of the Legislature to make rules regarding service conditions of State employees is derived from Art.246 read with item 41 in List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, and there was no excessive delegation under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968.

Headnote:

Delegation of Legislative Power - Civil Supplies Department - Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 - Art.309 of the Constitution - Excessive Delegation - Violation of Art.16 of the Constitution

Fact of the Case:

The case involved complaints from employees of the Civil Supplies Department in the State regarding the reservation of promotion posts for employees of the Revenue Department, governed by executive orders and subsequently by Special Rules framed under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968.

Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the contention that the power conferred by Art.309 of the Constitution prohibits delegation of legislative power for regulating recruitment and conditions of service. It also held that there was no excessive delegation under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968. The court further found that the import of employees from the Revenue Department into the Civil Supplies Department did not violate Art.16 of the Constitution.

Issues: Validity of Special Rules framed under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 and the reservation of promotion posts for employees of the Revenue Department in the Civil Supplies Department.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the power of the Legislature to make rules regarding service conditions of State employees is derived from Art.246 read with item 41 in List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. It also found that there was no excessive delegation under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968. Additionally, the court determined that the import of employees from the Revenue Department into the Civil Supplies Department did not violate Art.16 of the Constitution.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions and directed the parties to bear their respective costs.

Judgment :-

1. The questions raised in these two petitions are the same, and very briefly stated and they relate to the complaints of persons who have been working in the Civil Supplies Department in the State which was mace a separate department. Admittedly from the year 1962 the promotion posts available in the department were not exclusively reserved for those working in the Civil Supplies Department but 50 percent of such posts were reserved for promotions of persons working in the Revenue Department in the State. The pleadings in these cases are fairly elaborate. When the petitions were filed, the reservations of a percentage of the promotion posts for those in the Revenue Department were governed by executive orders and such orders have been impugned in these petitions. We are however not referring to these executive orders in view of the subsequent events that have taken place; framing of Special Rules by the State Government under the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 relating to the Kerala Civil Supplies Service and the Kerala Civil Supplies Subordinate Service. These Rules have been produced as Exts. P9 in O. P. No. 1022 and as Exts. P32 and P33 in O. P. No. 4790 of 1970 and the two original petitions have been amended to include the relief of setting aside these rules. These rules naturally supersede the earlier orders and govern the matter of promotions. The only question therefore now arising for determination is whether there are grounds for setting aside these rules. We assume for the present that all persons working in the Civil Supplies Department are now to be governed by these rules. We will be dealing with this question whether they are all governed by these rules presently.

2. We shall be referring to the exhibits in O. P. No. 1022 of 1970

3. We shall first refer to the contention regarding the validity of the rules. Counsel for the petitioners has contended that Exts. P19 and P20 were framed by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred by S.2 of the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 and that this power conferred on the State Government under S.2 of the Kerala Public Services Act is not a valid provision in view of the provision in Art.309 of the Constitution. S.2 (1) is in these terms:

"2. Regulation of recruitment and conditions of service. (1) The Government may make rules to regulate the recruitment, and conditions of service of persons appointed, to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the State of Kerala."

And Art.309 without the proviso thereto runs thus:

"309. Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Acts of the appropriate Legislature may regulate the recruitment, and conditions of service of persons appointed, to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State:"

The argument that has been advanced is that Art.309 makes it clear that the regulation of the recruitment and conditions of service has to be by the appropriate Legislature and that in view of this provision in this Article service conditions can be regulated by a law enacted by the Legislature and not by the rules framed under an enactment passed by the Legislature, by the delegated authority. It is contended that no law made under the power conferred by Art.309 can provide for any delegated authority to make rules in relation to the recruitment and conditions of service. It is further contended that in any view of the matter the delegation in this case is excessive.

4. As regards the first point, we thick that the power of the Legislature is derived by virtue of Art.246 read with item 41 in List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. Item 41 in List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution is in these terms:

"41. State public services: State Public Service Commission."

This gives ample and wide powers to the Legislature to make rules not only regarding the recruitment but relating to the service conditions of the State employees, It is not suggested th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top