SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ker) 231

G.VISWANATHA.IYER
KSEB – Appellant
Versus
C. G. NARAYANAN – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. These three revision petitions arise out of three applications, O. P. Nos. 76/70, 77/70 and 78/70 on the file of the District Court, Trichur. Those three applications were considered jointly and a consolidated order was passed by the District Judge and in this Court also I am considering all these together in this order.

2. These applications were filed before the District Judge, Trichur, for compensation under S.16 of the Telegraph Act, 1885 read with S.51, Electricity Act, 1910. For supply of electricity electric lines were taken over the property involved in these cases by the Electricity Board who is the respondent in all the three applications. According to the petitioner, who is the same in all the applications, on account of taking electric lines over his property 25 coconut trees have been cot from it and he has suffered damage on account of it. He also claimed damages for the diminution of the value of the portion of the property underneath the electric lines. Again be also claimed damages for the loss of one cent of land, rendered useless by the construction of a tower in it. As stated earlier, the learned District Judge, Trichur, considered these claims and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top