Judges : V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
P.A.YOOSUF - Appellant
Versus
KUMARANELLOOR PANCHAYAT - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 615 of 1971
Decided On : 12/13/1972
Advocates Appeared :
K. K. Usha; M. K. Rema Devi; For Petitioner Joseph Augustine; M. C. Mathew; For 1st Respondent Government Pleader; For 2nd Respondent
Panchayat - Recovery of Dues - Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - S.74
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner won the right to conduct cultural programmes on Panchayat property through an auction but defaulted on the balance payment. The Panchayat initiated a criminal prosecution under S.74 of the Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 to recover the amount due.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the amount due under the contract did not fall within the categories of dues recoverable under S.74 and the Panchayat had no jurisdiction to initiate a criminal prosecution for recovery.
Issues: The main issue was whether the amount due to the Panchayat under the contract could be recovered through the procedure prescribed under S.74 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on precedents and held that money due under a contract cannot be summarily recovered under the Act. It emphasized that the provisions of S.74 did not cover the amount sought to be recovered.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the criminal prosecution initiated against the petitioner was quashed.
1. The question raised in this writ petition is whether an amount due to a Panchayat under a contract whereby the right to conduct certain cultural programme in a property belonging to the Panchayat was farmed out to the petitioner who was the highest bidder at an auction conducted by the Panchayat, can be recovered by the Panchayat by resorting to the procedure for recovery of taxes, cesses, fees etc. prescribed under S.74 of the Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
2. The petitioner was granted by the Panchayat the exclusive right to conduct "cultural programmes" in a property belonging to the Panchayat situated in Survey No. 19/6 of Perumayikad Village for a period of three months commencing from 25-7-1970 for a total consideration of Rs, 5.130/-, that being the highest bid amount fetched at a public auction held by the Panchayat for farming out the said right. Out of the aforesaid bid amount the petitioner paid a sum of Rs. 1,710 on 13 71970 and an agreement was executed between the petitioner and one surety on the one part and the Panchayat on the other incorporating the terms of the arrangement. Ext. P1 is a copy of the said agreement. Subsequently, the petitioner committed default in the matter of remitting the balance amount due under the agreement in spite of notice having been issued to him by the Panchayat demanding payment. Thereupon, the Panchayat instituted a prosecution against the petitioner by presenting the complaint Ext P3 before the Munsiff-Magistrate, Ettumannoor purporting to be under the second proviso to S.74 of the Act. The petitioner has come up to this court with this writ petition seeking to quash Ext. P3 and praying also for the issuance of an appropriate writ prohibiting the 2nd respondent the Munsiff-Magistrate, Ettumanoor from proceeding with the trial of the criminal case.
3. S.74 of the Act is in the following terms:
"Any arrear of cess, rate, surcharge or tax imposed or fees levied under this Act shall be recoverable as an arrear of public revenue under the law relating to the recovery of arrears of public 'revenue for the time being in force:
Provided that the executive authority may directly recover by distraint, under his warrant, and sale of movable properties of the defaulter subject to such rules as may be prescribed.
Provided further that, if for any reason the distraint or a sufficient distraint of the defaulter's property is impracticable; the executive authority may prosecute the defaulters before a Magistrate."
Counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent Panchayat relied also on the following rule framed by the State Government as per SRO. No. 319/62 published in the Kerala Gazette dated 13th November, 1962:
"All costs, damages; compensation; penalties; charges, fees (other than school fees) expenses, rents, contributions and other sums which under the Kerala Panchayats Act; 1960 (Act 32 of 1960) or any other law or rules or byelaws made thereunder are due by any person to the Panchayat; may, if there is no special provision in the Actor in the other law or in the rules or byelaws made thereunder for their recovery be demanded by bill which shall be served on the person concerned and recovered in the manner provided in the rules for the collection of taxes under the said Act."
The question is whether the provisions of S.74 read along with the aforementioned rule warrant the action taken by the Panchayat in instituting a prosecution against the petitioner for the recovery of the balance amount due under the agreement Ext. P1. The answer to that will depend upon whether the amount that is sought to be recovered by the Panchayat can be regarded as "any arrear of cess, rate, surcharge or tax imposed or fees levied under this Act" which are the only categories of dues that can be recovered under S.74, and, if it is not covered by S.74, whether it doss fall within any of the descriptions of the various class of outstandings enumerated in the aforeme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.