1. The respondent in an application before the Land Tribunal for purchase of kudikidappu is the revision petitioner. According to the applicant, she is a kudikidappukari entitled to apply for purchase the kudikidappu under S.80 B of the Land Reforms Act. On that basis, an application was put in before the Land Tribunal. The revision petitioner who was respondent, took objection to this application mainly on two grounds. The first objection was that the applicant is not a kudikidappukari. The building that she is in occupation, was constructed about 10 years back at a cost of Rs. 2,500 and secondly that the respondent is having only less than 1 acre and therefore, the application for purchase of kudikidappu is not maintainable before the expiry of two years provided for the respondent to make an application before the Government for acquisition of other land to which the kudikidappu may be shifted. The Land Tribunal after this objection was received, directed an inquiry to be made by the Revenue Inspector as regards the value of the building. The Revenue Inspector submitted the report dated 28-1-1971 in which the value of the building was stated to be Rs. 300/-. This ass