SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ker) 128

K.BASKARAN
KUNHI PATHU – Appellant
Versus
AYSHU – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner in this revision petition under S.103 of the Land Reforms Act (Act 1 of 1964 as amended by Act 35 of 1969) is the petitioner in O. A. No. 138 of 1966 on the file of the Land Tribunal (Munsiff) of Kozhikode. The respondent is the respondent in the said proceedings before the Land Tribunal.

2. In order to appreciate the scope of the contentions raised in this revision petition, it is necessary to narrate briefly the facts of the case which are as follows: The petitioner filed O. A. No. 138/66 under S.15 of Act 1 of 1964 for resuming the land held by the respondent as tenant under her. The respondent contested the matter, but without success. On 1712 1966 the order for resumption was passed. An appeal, A. A/Kozhikode/15/70 on the file of the Appellate Authority (Land Reforms), Kozhikode (which was originally filed as C. M. A. 9/67 in the Sub Court, Badagara) filed by the respondent, was dismissed on 21 111970. It is also represented that revision filed by the respondent against the judgment of the appellate authority was dismissed by this Court at the stage of admission.

3. However, it has not been possible for the petitioner to realise the benefits of the






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top