P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
SUBRAMONIAM – Appellant
Versus
SREENIVASAN – Respondent
1. I am afraid the suit is misconceived. Though the maintainability of the suit was challenged by the first defendant successfully is the trial court, the court below has held that the suit as framed would lie and the plaintiff is entitled to seek the reliefs which he has claimed in the suit.
2. Plaintiff has styled himself as the manager of one Prabha Talkies, a theatre exhibiting cinematograph films at Tellicherry. According to him the proprietor of the concern is his sister-in-law and on her behalf he is managing the business. First defendant is the proprietor of one Lotus Talkies engaged in the business of exhibition of cinematograph films for which purpose he applied for licence to the Tellicherry Municipality and obtained the same. The Municipal Commissioner of the Tellicherry Municipality is the second defendant. Plaintiff bad objected to the issue of licence to the first defendant on several grounds including one that the distance between the two theatres was less than what is prescribed by the rules. This objection of the plaintiff was not looked into and therefore the order is characterised as illegal and void. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction restrai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.