Judges : P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
HARRISONS AND CROSFIELD LTD. - Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE - Respondent
Case No : S. A. No. 519 of 1969
Decided On : 07/19/1971
Advocates Appeared :
P. K. Kurian; For Appellant Government Pleader; For Respondent
S. 3 - Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1963 - S.2(18) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 - The court discussed the definition of 'motor vehicle' and its application to the case, emphasizing that a motor vehicle must be adapted for use on roads. The court considered the interpretation of 'adapted' and concluded that if a vehicle has the potential to be used on the roads, it qualifies as a motor vehicle, regardless of its current use. The court rejected the contention that the vehicle's confinement to factory premises excluded it from being a motor vehicle.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff company possessed a tractor and was called upon to pay tax under the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963. The plaintiff challenged the tax notices, claiming that the tractor, fitted with a hydraulically operated shovel and confined to factory premises, did not qualify as a motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act 1939.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the plaintiff's contention that the tractor was not a motor vehicle, emphasizing that its potential for use on roads qualified it as a motor vehicle. The court also clarified the date from which tax was due and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Issues: The issues revolved around the definition of 'motor vehicle' and its application to the plaintiff's tractor, as well as the date from which tax was due.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of 'adapted' in the definition of 'motor vehicle' and the determination that a vehicle's potential for use on roads qualified it as a motor vehicle, regardless of its current use.
Final Decision: The second appeal was dismissed with costs.
1. S. 3 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act 1963 charges to tax motor vehicles "used or kept for use in the State". 'Motor vehicle' is not a terra defined in that Act but the definition in the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 would apply. That is so provided in the Act. The definition of 'Motor vehicle' in the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 as contained in S.2(18) of the Act is as follows: "Motor vehicle" means any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads whether the power of propulsion is transmitted thereto from an external or internal source and includes a chassis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer; but does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises."
It is apparent from the definition that motor vehicle must be one adapted for use on roads. It is the construction of this term that I am concerned with in the second appeal.
2. Plaintiff company possessed a tractor K.L.Q. 2102 for which the company was called upon to pay tax under the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963 Notices were served on the plaintiff and two such notices one for Rs. 2400 for the period from 1-7-1958 to 30-3-1963 and another for Rs. 1,320 for the period from 14 1963 to 3131966 are challenged in the suit and an inju-nction restraining proceedings for recovery pursuant to the notices is sought for. Subsequent to the filing of the suit Government exempted the vehicle from tax for the period from 171958 to 30 6-1963, with the result that the claim for tax from 1-7-1563 to 313,966 is alone challenged thereafter.
3. The challenge is on the ground that the vehicle which is a tractor fitted with hydraulically operated shovel is confined in its operation to the factory premises and therefore it is not a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939. Consequently, according to the plaintiff, it is not a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963.
4. Before I advert to the above contention I must also notice another contention by counsel that even assuming it as a motor vehicle it is not used or kept for use in the State. Of course that contention has only to be stated to be rejected. That it is so kept for use in the State is evident from the very admission of the purpose for which it is being operated.
5. The more serious contention turns on the construction of the definition of the term 'motor vehicle'. The counsel for the appellant-plaintiff cannot certainly contend that the vehicle cannot be put to use elsewhere. In fact the counsel has not attempted to go to that extent. The case is that actually it is not being put to use anywhere outside the factory premises. That it is not physically possible to pat it to use elsewhere than the factory premises is not a contention which is urged or which, if urged, would stand. Therefore the question is whether the fact that it is not being used or even the fact that it is not intended to be used outside the factory premises would be sufficient to take it out of the category of motor vehicles as defined in S.2 (18) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939. That would depend upon the construction to be put on the words 'adapted' in the sub-section. According to counsel for the appellant 'adapted to be used' must be read to mean 'used' and inspiration for this is sought to be drawn from a decision in State of Mysore v. Syed Ibrahim (AIR. 1967 Supreme Court 1424)
6. In the case before the Supreme Court, to which I have just now adverted, the question was whether the owner of a vehicle which did not have a permit for use as a transport vehicle but was nevertheless used, on occasions, for carriage of goods, was to be considered to have contravened S.42(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 which prohibits the owner of a transport vehicle from using or permitting the use of a transport vehicle in any public place, save in accordance with the conditions of a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.