SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Ker) 224

T.C.RAGHAVAN, P.UNNIKRISHNA KURUP
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GOPINATHAN NAIR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The first of these appeals is by the first defendant, the drawee bank of a draft for Rs. 4000/- taken by the plaintiff at its Alleppey branch payable to Pw. 2, the proprietor of Hurry Das Auddy, at the New Market branch of the bank at Calcutta. The draft was sent by the plaintiff to a friend of his, pw.1; but it was intercepted in transit by the third defendant, a customer of the second defendant bank. And the Shambazar branch of the second defendant collected the draft from the first defendant. The amount was also withdrawn by the third defendant. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of the amount against defendants 1 to 3; and all the courts including a judge of this Court in second appeal held that defendants 1 and 3 were liable. The appeal is against that decision The third defendant did not contest.

2. The second of the appeals is by the second defendant, the collecting bank who collected the draft from the first defendant on behalf of its customer, the third defendant. The trial court dismissed the suit against the second defendant; but the lower appellate court and the second appellate judge held that the second defendant was also liable. And A. S. A No. 1





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top