T.C.RAGHAVAN, P.UNNIKRISHNA KURUP
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GOPINATHAN NAIR – Respondent
1. The first of these appeals is by the first defendant, the drawee bank of a draft for Rs. 4000/- taken by the plaintiff at its Alleppey branch payable to Pw. 2, the proprietor of Hurry Das Auddy, at the New Market branch of the bank at Calcutta. The draft was sent by the plaintiff to a friend of his, pw.1; but it was intercepted in transit by the third defendant, a customer of the second defendant bank. And the Shambazar branch of the second defendant collected the draft from the first defendant. The amount was also withdrawn by the third defendant. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of the amount against defendants 1 to 3; and all the courts including a judge of this Court in second appeal held that defendants 1 and 3 were liable. The appeal is against that decision The third defendant did not contest.
2. The second of the appeals is by the second defendant, the collecting bank who collected the draft from the first defendant on behalf of its customer, the third defendant. The trial court dismissed the suit against the second defendant; but the lower appellate court and the second appellate judge held that the second defendant was also liable. And A. S. A No. 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.