SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Ker) 76

P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI
KUNHIKALANDAR – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL KHADER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Plaintiff sues on a promissory note for Rs. 5000/- executed by the defendant on 19 91958. The only plea of the defendant that is relevant for the purpose of this second appeal is one that the promissory note is not supported by consideration to the extent of Rs. 1900/-. This plea was accepted by the trial court and in appeal by the plaintiff this has been confirmed. Though plaintiff called into aid the presumption under S.118 (a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the courts below have held that the benefit of that presumption would not be available to the plaintiff since, even the plaint allegations would show that the payment of consideration was not in the manner mentioned in the promissory note.

2. Ex.A1, the promissory note, mentions the consideration of Rs. 5000/-as paid in cash. But in the plaint it is averred by the plaintiff that Rs. 1600/- was paid by way of cheque, Rs.1900/- was paid in cash and later the sum of Rs. 1500/- was paid by cheques. The payment of consideration in cash on 19 91958, the date of execution of the promissory note, is denied by the defendant. If the presumption under S.118 (a) could be called into aid and such presumption would







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top