SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Ker) 208

T.C.RAGHAVAN
KERALA TRANSPORT COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
COLONIAL DISTRIBUTORS – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The civil revision petition arises out of a proceeding under Order VIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure for impleading a third party as a defendant.Two objections were raised before the lower court: one, that there was no privity of contract between the plaintiff and the third party sought to be impleaded; and two, that the lower court had no jurisdiction to decide the question of contribution or indemnification between the defendant and the third party sought to be impleaded. The first objection the lower court rejected; but, on the second objection, the lower court agreed with the contention of the third party and dismissed the application for impleading.

Two decisions were cited before the lower court, both of the Madras High Court, one by Rajamannar C. J. in S. S. Subula Sahib. v. N. Periyanna Pillai (AIR. 1957 Madras 679, and the other by Srinivasan J. in Roy and Chatterjee (Private) Ltd. v. Scindia Steam Navigation Company Ltd. (AIR. 1961 Madras 367). The first decision related to the first objection; and Rajamannar C. J. held that between the third party sought to be impleaded and the plaintiff there could, generally speaking, be no privity of contract. The th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top