SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Ker) 156

P.UNNIKRISHNA KURUP, K.SADASIVAN, T.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY IYER
AMMUKUTTY AMMA – Appellant
Versus
MADHAVI AMMA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. These appeals against second appeals arise from two suits, O.S. Nos. 329 and 340 of 1121 on the file of Munsiff's Court, Ettum-anoor. O.S. No. 329 of 1121, from which A.S. No. 410 of 1965 arises, was filed for specific performance of an agreement to sell the plaint schedule property entered into by the 1st defendant in the suit with the plaintiff. The 1st defenant thereafter gifted the property to his wife, the 2nd defendant, and defendants 1 and 2 sold the property to the 3rd defendant. The prayer in the suit was to compel the 1st defendant to execute a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff on receipt of the amount stipulated to be paid under agreement to sell.

2. A.S. No. 409 of 1962 arisee from OS. No. 340 of 1121. That was a suit filed for redemption by the 3rd defendant in OS. No. 329 of 1121 against the plaintiff in that suit on the strength of a possessory mortgage for Rs. 225/-and the result of this suit was mainly dependent upon the suit for specific performance.

3. The trial court held that time was the essence of the contract and since the plaintiff in OS. No. 329 of 1121 had not paid the amount and demanded execution of the document within the time stipulate












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top