V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, T.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY IYER, K.K.MATHEW, P.T.RAMAN NAYAR, P.GOVINDA NAIR
LAKSHMI AMMA ALIAS ECHUMA AMMA – Appellant
Versus
DEVASSY – Respondent
1. (Govindan Nair, Mathew and Balakrishna Eradi, JJ. agreeing with him): Until the 20th of May 1967, S.27 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act for short the Act read thus:
"27. Fair rent. (1) The fair rent in respect of a holding shall be the rent payable by the cultivating
tenant to his landlord and it shall be the rent calculated at the rates specified in Schedule III applicable to the class of lands comprised in the holding or the contract rent, whichever is less.
Explanation. Where the fair rent in respect of a holding has been determined under any law in force immediately before the 21st January, 1961, the fair rent so determined shall be deemed to be the contract rent for the purposes of this sub-section.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (i), the fair rent in respect of a holding, where the cultivating tenant or an intermediary is holding under a smallholder, shall, at the option of the small-holder, be
(a) the rent calculated at the rates specified in Schedule III applicable to the class of lands comprised in the holding; or
(b) Where the fair rent in respect of the holding has been determined under any law in force immediately before the 21st January, 1
AIR 1960 SC 655; (1962) 2 SCR 59; AIR 1969 SC 239 AIR 1969 SC 239
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.