SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ker) 59

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, K.K.MATHEW, P.T.RAMAN NAYAR
PUNNEN THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

Eradi J.)

1. The petitioner, V. Punnen Thomas, who describes himself as a Government contractor, takes exception to the following order made by the respondent State Government:

"Sub:-Forest Irregularities in Forest contract tenderers blacklisted.

It has been revealed that Sri. V. M. Mohammed Shafi, Karakad House, Erattupetta and Sri. Punnen Thomas, Valanjathil, Kottayam have committed irregularities in connection with the tender for working down timber from Udumbanchola Block 1, with the result that Government had to sustain loss to a considerable extent. Government therefore order that these two persons are blacklisted and debarred from taking any Government work for the next ten years.

The Chief Conservator of Forests is informed that Sri. Punnen Thomas will however be permitted to do the work as per orders contained in Government Memorandum No. 12319/ F1/65/Agri. dated 7-4 -1965.

Sd/-T. R. Sukumaran Nair, Joint Secretary.

To

The Chief Conservator of Forests'.

2. The petitioner's grievance is that he was not heard before the order was made and he wants this court to quash the order and restrain the respondent from giving effect to it. His case is that the order is violative o






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top