SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ker) 102

P.T.RAMAN NAYAR, K.K.MATHEW, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
CICILY – Appellant
Versus
SULAIKHA BEEVI – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The 1st defendant in O.S. 709 of 1959 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Trivandrum is the appellant before us.

2. The plaintiff - respondent brought the aforesaid suit for partition and separate possession of her alleged 1/3 share in the plaint schedule property after redemption of a usufructuary mortgage dated 13-9-1918 evidenced by Ext. P4 on payment of the proportionate mortgage amount to the 1st. defendant. The courts below have upheld the plaintiff's right to 5/32 shares in the plaint schedule property and passed a preliminary decree for partition and redemption entitling the plaintiff to recover possession of her aforesaid share on deposit of the proportionate mortgage amount and value of improvements. In this second appeal the only contention raised before us on behalf of the appellant is that the plaintiff's right to recover possession of her share of the suit property had become extinguished by adverse possession and limitation and that the suit ought to have been dismissed as barred under Art.144 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

3. The plaint schedule property belonged to one Vappu Kochika who died leaving four sons Vava Kunju, Moideen Kunju, Adima and Sayed Mo





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top