SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Ker) 172

T.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY IYER
RAJAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
VEERARAGHAVA IYER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question to be decided in this case depends upon the true effect of Ex. P 1 dated 17-8-1964 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.

2. The plaint A schedule property comprises an extent of 45 3/4 cents of land and a cinema theatre standing thereon by name 'Pioneer Theatre' in Irinjalakuda. The suit is for preventive injunction to restrain the defendant from entering into the plaint A schedule property and conducting cinema shows in the Pioneer Theatre and for mandatory injunction directing him to hand over the movables mentioned in the plaint B schedule to the plaintiff. The plaintiffs case is that by Ex. P 1 the defendant was given a personal privilege to conduct cinema shows in the 'Pioneer Theatre' for which purpose the theatre along with the movables mentioned in the plaint B schedule were entrusted to him. Since the term of three years in Ex. P 1 is over it is alleged by the plaintiff that the defendant is no longer entitled to conduct the shows. The defendant's plea is that Ex. P 1 is a lease and that he is not a mere licensee and that therefore the suit is not maintainable. It is further contended by the defendant that he has constructed a boo

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top