T.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY IYER
RAJAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
VEERARAGHAVA IYER – Respondent
1. The question to be decided in this case depends upon the true effect of Ex. P 1 dated 17-8-1964 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
2. The plaint A schedule property comprises an extent of 45 3/4 cents of land and a cinema theatre standing thereon by name 'Pioneer Theatre' in Irinjalakuda. The suit is for preventive injunction to restrain the defendant from entering into the plaint A schedule property and conducting cinema shows in the Pioneer Theatre and for mandatory injunction directing him to hand over the movables mentioned in the plaint B schedule to the plaintiff. The plaintiffs case is that by Ex. P 1 the defendant was given a personal privilege to conduct cinema shows in the 'Pioneer Theatre' for which purpose the theatre along with the movables mentioned in the plaint B schedule were entrusted to him. Since the term of three years in Ex. P 1 is over it is alleged by the plaintiff that the defendant is no longer entitled to conduct the shows. The defendant's plea is that Ex. P 1 is a lease and that he is not a mere licensee and that therefore the suit is not maintainable. It is further contended by the defendant that he has constructed a boo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.