SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ker) 97

K.K.MATHEW
SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioner is the accused in C. C. No. 351/66 on the file of the Sub Magistrate's Court, Quilon-1. The complaint against the accused was that he committed an offence punishable under S.417 of the I. P. C. in that he issued a cheque and that the cheque when presented for payment in the Bank concerned was dishonoured. The learned Magistrate finding that there was a prima facie case has issued process to the accused under S.204 of the Crl. P. C. According to the accused the Magistrate should not have taken cognizance of the offence by issuing process to the accused under S.204 of the Crl. P. C. as he should have found that the allegations in the complaint do not make out an offence. He filed a revision (Crl. R. P. 6 /1966) before the District Magistrate Gudl.), Quilon, to quash the proceedings of the Sub Magistrate. That was dismissed. Hence this revision.

2. To decide the question whether the commission of any offence is disclosed by the allegations in the complaint it is necessary to advert to a few facts. The complainant had joined the service of the United Traders (Regd)., Thiruvalla. On his joining the service he had deposited Rs. 500/- as security with




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top