K.K.MATHEW
SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR – Respondent
1. The revision petitioner is the accused in C. C. No. 351/66 on the file of the Sub Magistrate's Court, Quilon-1. The complaint against the accused was that he committed an offence punishable under S.417 of the I. P. C. in that he issued a cheque and that the cheque when presented for payment in the Bank concerned was dishonoured. The learned Magistrate finding that there was a prima facie case has issued process to the accused under S.204 of the Crl. P. C. According to the accused the Magistrate should not have taken cognizance of the offence by issuing process to the accused under S.204 of the Crl. P. C. as he should have found that the allegations in the complaint do not make out an offence. He filed a revision (Crl. R. P. 6 /1966) before the District Magistrate Gudl.), Quilon, to quash the proceedings of the Sub Magistrate. That was dismissed. Hence this revision.
2. To decide the question whether the commission of any offence is disclosed by the allegations in the complaint it is necessary to advert to a few facts. The complainant had joined the service of the United Traders (Regd)., Thiruvalla. On his joining the service he had deposited Rs. 500/- as security with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.