Judges : M.S.MENON,M.U.ISAAC
West Coast Employers Federation - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala And Others - Respondent
Case No : Writ Appeal No. 238 of 1966 from O. P. No. 792 of 1965
Decided On : 03/06/1967
Advocates Appeared :
P. K. Kurien; For Appellant T. C. N. Menon; T. N. Hareendran; For Respondent
Minimum Wages Act - Regional Classification - S.3 (1)(b), S.5 (2) - Art.43 of the Constitution - Adam Smith and David Ricardo's Principles - Capacity to Pay - Discriminatory Treatment - Art.14 of the Constitution
Fact of the Case:
The appellants challenged the validity of a notification issued by the State of Kerala under S.3 (1)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, dividing the State into three separate areas and fixing minimum wages for each area. They contended that the lower minimum wages fixed for the Trichur area were not warranted by the Act, as it loaded the scales against them in a competitive market.
Finding of the Court:
The Court analyzed the principles of fair wages, living wage, and the Minimum Wages Act, emphasizing that the minimum wage represents the lower limit of the fair wage and should provide for the preservation of the efficiency of the worker. The Court also highlighted the relevance of regional classification and the burden of proving discriminatory treatment under Art.14 of the Constitution. The Court concluded that while the burden of proving discriminatory treatment was not discharged, a fresh enquiry into the situation was necessary, directing the Government to modify the notification if found necessary.
Issues: The issues involved the validity of regional classification for fixing minimum wages, the principles of fair wages and living wage, and the burden of proving discriminatory treatment under Art.14 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that the minimum wage should provide for the preservation of the efficiency of the worker and that the capacity to pay is not a relevant factor for the fixation of minimum wages under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The burden of proving discriminatory treatment under Art.14 of the Constitution lies with the party alleging a violation of equality.
Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, and the Government was directed to conduct a fresh enquiry into the situation and modify the notification if found necessary.
1. The petitioners in O.P. No. 792 of 1965 are the appellants in this writ appeal. They challenged, without success, the validity of Ext. P1, a notification issued by the 1st respondent the State of Kerala under S.3 (1)(b) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, read with S.5 (2) of the said enactment and published in the Kerala Gazette dated the 16th March, 1965.
2. Ext. P1 divided the State into three separate areas:
(1) Quilon and Feroke area, consisting of Quilon, Trivandrum, Kozhikode and Cannanore Districts,
(2) Alwaye area consisting of Ernakulam, Alleppey and Kottayam Districts, and
(3) Trichur area, consisting of Trichur and Palghat Districts and fixed the minimum wages for each of those areas. The earlier notification the notification that Ext. P1 superseded was dated the 12th May 1958.
3. The minimum wages fixed for the Trichur area are lower than those fixed for the other two areas; and the contention of the appellants is that such a fixation is not warranted by the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The contention is not that the minimum wages fixed for the areas with which they are concerned are too high. The contention is that the lower rate fixed for the Trichur area loads the scales very much against them as the tile industry is essentially dependent on man power and sells its products in an identical and competitive market. The judgment under appeal sums up their submissions as follows:
"Counsel for the petitioners submitted that there is nothing to show that the needs of the workers in the industry in the Trichur area are less than the needs of the workers in other areas or that the workload in the Trichur area is less than in the other areas, that in similar notifications the Madras and Mysore States did not make any regional classification for the purpose of fixing minimum wages, and that the Kerala Government have not fixed different minimum wages for different areas in the State in respect of other industries, that all the owners of tile factories in Feroke, Quilon and Trichur areas depend practically on the same market for the purpose of the sale of tiles, that 65 per cent of the total tiles are manufactured in the Trichur area and the quality of the tiles manufactured in the Trichur area is as good as those produced elsewhere in the State."
4. The only relevant consideration for the fixing of minimum wages is the minimal requirements of the workers concerned. No other consideration for example, the capacity of the industry to pay the minimum wage arises for consideration.
5. A fair wage is the demand and the destination. Its upper limit is the "living wage". One of the Principles of State Policy the principle embodied in Art.43 of the Constitution directs that the State shall endeavour to secure, by suitable legislation or economic organisation or in any other way, to all workers, agricultural, industrial or otherwise, work, a living wage and conditions of work ensuring a decent standard of life and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities.
6. The minimum wage is the lower limit of the fair wage. It should provide according to the Committee on Fair Wages, "not merely for the bare sustenance of life but for the preservation of the efficiency of the worker by providing for some measure of education, medical requirements and amenities."
Adam Smith and David Ricardo. Adam Smith wrote in his Wealth of Nations:
"The wages paid to journeymen (workers) and servants of every kind must be such as may enable them, one with another, to continue the race of journeymen and servants, according as the increasing, diminishing or stationary demand of the society may happen to require."and David Ricardo in his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation:
"The natural price of labour is that price which is necessary to enable the labourers, one with another, to subsist and to perpetuate their race, without either increase or diminution.
8. The minimum wage, therefore, represents the limit below which the wages shall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.