SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ker) 94

M.U.ISAAC
K. V. POULOSE – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This Original Petition raises the question relating to the validity and applicability of R.5 in Chapter XIV (A) of the Kerala Education R.1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), made by the Government in exercise of the powers under S.36 of the Kerala Education Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The petitioner is the manager of an Upper Primary School. The 4th respondent, who was an untrained candidate, was appointed by the petitioner as a teacher in the school during the year 1962-63, after advertising the vacancy and establishing the non-availability of trained hands. Her appointment was approved by the first respondent; and on the basis of this service, she was selected for Teachers' Training Course in the Department quota. Accordingly, she was relieved from service at the end of the year; and she joined the T. T. Course. She completed the course, which is for 2 years, and passed in the examination held in April 1965. A vacancy arose in the school during the year 1965 66. The petitioner advertised the vacancy in the Malayalam Daily "Deepika", on 17 51965. It is stated by the 4th respondent that immediately after the school re opened in 1965, sh











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top