K.SADASIVAN
SULAIMAN SAIT MOHAMED YOUSUF SAIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
1. The petitioner Sulaiman Sait Mohammed Yousuf Sait stands convicted by the District Magistrate of Trivandrum under S, 3 read with S.25 (1) (a) of the Arms Act, 1959 for having been found in possession of a revolver, a gun and some ammunition without license and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 150. The conviction and sentence have been confirmed in appeal, by the Sessions Judge of Trivandrum.
2. The accused's plan was two-fold; firstly, that he was not in physical possession of the building from where the contraband articles were recovered; and secondly that the arms recovered themselves have not been proved to be articles falling under the mischief of the Arms Act. The arms recovered are: one revolver, 18 cartridges, empty cartridges 30, a tin with gun powder, one gun, one barrel, one shield, one barrel cleaner, one big bullet case, 17 bullet cases, metal pieces and a tin containing 150 cases. The seizure happened to be made in the following circumstances:
The accused was the petitioner in Debt Relief application 3 of 1964 on the file of the Addl. Sub Court, Trivandrum. The petition is one under S.15 of the Act praying for a full settlement of his debts. As provided in S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.